Reclaiming a little America Sovereignty

Withdrawing from the non-binding climate thingy was the best news possible for this Republic. Reclaiming a little of American Sovereignty. The Liberal Leftist Socialist Progressives are going nuts, again a good thing.

I did set a fishing pole(rod and reel)and associated fishing tackle on the front and back porches of my home just in case the seas did begin to rise. The front porch faces east towards the Atlantic ocean, the back porch faces west towards the Gulf of Mexico. I also removed the tie-downs on my boat, again just in case. I keep going out to check, nothing yet.

I wonder if the rise in sea levels would be effected any if every Climate Activist would jump in to the Oceans and Seas of the world. I know that they worry so(they claim)over the Polar Bears, I thought that by now they would be swimming north to save the poor Polar Bears. Haven’t heard of any activists swimming in any direction as of yet.

Well that is enough humor, for now at least. On to more serious matters.

I do believe that God made a promise, a promise recorded in the Bible. One by which he would not Destroy the World again with Water. A promise sealed with a Rainbow. Maybe the Liberal Leftist Socialist Progressives forgot that little tidbit. The Rainbow symbolizes a Promise from God, it does not symbolize the alternative lifestyle of some people. Using the most beautiful Promise from God to mankind to represent the most perverted lifestyle does not have any thing to do with fulfilling a Promise.

Perhaps if God had not been kicked out of the Schools and almost every other aspect of everyday life, by the Liberal Leftist Socialist Progressives, more people would come to the realization that Water will never be used to destroy the World again. It also amazes me that so many clergymen believe in the rising sea levels being a threat to mankind. The Rainbow in the sky appears before, during and after rain and sometimes for no reason at all. When I see one I am reminded of the Promise, the Promise from God, to me it says Fear Not.

Moving on again.

Carrying on an American tradition. The withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord was basically an act of Secession. It was not Treason or anything of the like. It was a single(first)step towards reclaiming American Sovereignty. The whole thing as written was bad for America. President Trump knew it was bad for America, he did the right thing by Seceding from it. Seceding from the Paris deal was the right thing to do, the right thing for America to do. America should have never been in it to start with.

America had in the past removed itself from things that were harmful to America. Remaining in a union with Great Britain in 1776, for instance was and would be harmful to America. America seceded from Great Britain. America did not consider the opinion of Great Britain, or the opinion the rest of the world for that matter. America did what was best for America, and should always do so.

Are the Climate Activists now going to wage war against America and force America back into the Paris Accords? Much Like the U.S. Government and the Northern States did in dealing with the Southern States when they seceded.

There is perhaps many more acts of Secession America should engage in. One that I would like to see is that America secede from the United Nations. Yes, I would like to see America secede from the United Nations and then promptly kick their butts out of this Sovereign Republic. Remaining in the United Nation provides no benefit for America.

Do you think the rest of the member nations would be foolish enough to wage a war against America in an attempt force America back into the United Nations at the point of a Bloody Bayonet?

Long live the spirit of Secession. While that spirit lives the American Spirit is Live and Well. Perhaps with a little helping of Nullification.

DEO VINDICE

One last bit of humor before closing.
Went to check the rising Ocean Levels, nothing yet. If the Ocean will not come to me then by God, I will go to it. It looks like I will still have to buy a House Boat to be able to fish from the porch of my house. Perhaps I will instead buy a Mobile Home and fit it with pontoons, just in case. That way I would have a home if the sea levels rise and then recede again. The mobile home with pontoons is a much better idea, two for one, as house boats tend to lean a bit when on dry land, unless it is a flat bottom house boat. Oh, the decisions we must face.

A Little Common Sense Would be In Order Part 3 The United Nations and World Opinion

Perhaps it would help if the “distinguished” elected representatives(politicians) were to stop by the Library of Congress and do a little reading. Some suggestions would be The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, The Declaration of Arms, The Federalist Papers, The Anti-Federalist Papers, The Writings and Opinions of the Founding Fathers, the Articles of Confederation, also I might suggest Common Sense and The American Crisis by Thomas Paine. The previous list is only a partial list, but it would be a good start. One would think with all of the great literature available in the Library of Congress some of the “distinguished” elected representatives(politicians)would spend some time there, apparently that is not the case.

Common Sense is a term thrown about by the politicians, but politicians demonstrate at every opportunity that they truly lack any idea as to what Common Sense means or how to use it. They go against the very notion of using “common sense” in their statements and actions.
This post applies to our “distinguished” elected representatives(past and present), their merry band of minions(past and present), the liberals, the progressives, those masquerading as conservatives(past and present)and the MSM.

First and foremost America, itself, is not responsible for, nor can America itself be blamed for the drama, chaos and crises around the globe. The problems, turmoil and crises around the world are caused by world leaders, more correctly national leaders who view themselves as world leaders. The United Nations shares in the responsibility and blame for world problems, turmoil and crises, as does it’s predecessor The League of Nations. Why, you ask? The answer is really quite simple with the advent of these two world bodies the nations, sovereign nations, began to adjust policy, domestic as well as foreign. Some nations, America in particular, began a policy of caving into or adjusting to meet world opinion. Suddenly it became necessary for the world to view America in a “favorable light”. Conforming to world opinion became more important to the politicians than doing what was and is right for America and the legal lawful citizens.

The League of Nations came into existence after WWI and went “dormant” at the outbreak of WWII. The United Nations came into existence after WWII and lasts to this day. One thing both of these “world bodies’ have in common is that they were both dreams of the Liberals. Was it world opinion that caused America to enter WWII? No, it was brought about by an attack on Pearl Harbor. During WWII, America built alliances with nations to defeat the Axis Powers world opinion did not matter defeating the enemy is what mattered. If world opinion had mattered America would probably have never sided with or given aid to Stalin or Russia. Could this be the reason The U.S. and Russia who have a common enemy ISIL/ISIS/IS do not join together to fight the terrorists as a team? Both countries have a common enemy, but world opinion gets in the way. Russia is assisting one whom the world looks at unfavorably, Assad in Syria, while America wants a favorable world opinion. It seems that keeping a favorable world opinion is more important than defeating ISIL/ISIS/IS. America no longer builds alliances, instead America forms “coalitions”. It seems that only a “coalition” will satisfy the need to have a favorable “world opinion”. There was a time when America cared more about doing what was right and less about world opinion. There was a time when and where America went off to war to right a wrong, or help a nation that was under attack, now America goes off to war based on world opinion and takes sides based on the same world opinion. I ask you this which is better, a coalition acting on world opinion, or allies joining forces to do what is right?

“Common Sense” and logic would say that it is far past the time to disband the United Nations, and let it go down as yet another failed liberal attempt at what ever it was they envisioned. The money being wasted on that “distinguished” world body could be better used here in America. The giving of money to foreign entities such as the Palestinian Authority is based on what? Is it the right thing to do? Or is it to influence world opinion? The same goes for the billions upon billions of dollars to foreign nations. Here are some fitting questions. How much of the over 18 trillion dollars of the debt of the United States of America is because of the monies given to foreign governments? Does The American government borrow money to give away? Why is it that The government of the United States of America gives to money to governments who only wish to do America harm and seek to destroy America? Is this an attempt to buy a favorable world opinion? How much of the annual budget of the United Nations comes straight from The U.S.A.? Tomorrow is United Nations Day, there will most likely be some sort of gala or event to commemorate this “notable” event, how much will that cost?

Think on this, The U.S.A. as well as many other “advanced” nations around the world pour countless billions into the money pit that is the U.N. each and every year, this is done for what reason? Is it for the U.N. to promote “peace, well-being, harmony and equality” around the world? If this is the reason and the case, then I have some bad news for them, the U.N. has failed in all four areas. Equality could quite possibly be achieved one day, but it will not be the equality they envisioned.

Is it really all that important to conform to “world opinion” and become a part of the “world community” if in the process of conforming to the world that a sovereign nation looses its national identity to the point that the nation no longer places itself and its citizens first? To truly help another you must first take care of yourself. It really is time for the United Nations to go the way of The League of Nations and just cease to exist, go away quietly without even a whimper.

With that being said, there is nothing wrong with helping those who are in need, really in need. But it should be up to the nations of the world to choose who or what they will or will not help. It should be based on what is right and not based on world opinion. There was a time when American national leaders knew what was right, regardless of world opinion. For example is it right to support those who are determined to destroy another? Through the U.N., America supports those who would destroy our friends and also those who would destroy the U.S.A., that makes no sense common or otherwise.